PuGa/CLAUDE.md

PuGa: Prosperous Universe advisory toolkit

Agent-first toolkit for advising a Prosperous Universe player. The player asks questions; you answer by running the tools in tools/ against live data, not by guessing.

Read first

1. empire/PROFILE.md if it exists: who the player is, how they want answers, their company and current plans. empire/ is gitignored and holds everything specific to this player's empire (see Layout). If it does not exist, ask the player the basics and create it.
2. docs/mechanics.md for game mechanics (source of truth order below).
3. empire/state/company.yaml for the current position; refresh it with tools/state.py sync before answering anything about it.

Working rules

• Numbers, tables, ROI per day. Short answers, no fluff. Match the style in the player's profile.
• The player plays on browser APEX and may send screenshots; read them carefully, they override assumptions.
• Never guess APEX commands or numbers. Pull data (tools, FIO, PRUNplanner) or search.
• Label every number: live (tool output), state (company.yaml), or estimate; say which in-game command would confirm an estimate.
• Prices move; re-run tools before quoting. Anything older than a day is stale.
• Do not commit or push unless asked. Writes to the player's PRUNplanner account follow the guardrails in docs/decisions.md.

Source-of-truth rules

1. PRUNplanner code wins over our own docs for game mechanics (ref/frontend/src/features/planning/calculations/, ref/backend/). If any older handoff or note conflicts with it, the note is wrong; fix docs/mechanics.md.
2. In-game numbers the player reports beat both, especially for planet resource factors.
3. ref/ is a gitignored copy of the PRUNplanner repos; refresh with tools/refresh_refs.sh.

Setup

• Python venv at .venv (.venv/bin/python, .venv/bin/pip). Deps in requirements.txt.
• Secrets in .env (gitignored; template .env.example): FIO REST key, FIO API key, PRUNplanner key, FIO username, company code. Never print or commit them; do not ask the player to paste keys into chat.
• Scope: whole universe supported; default exchange from DEFAULT_CX (AI1 = Antares), --cx to change.

Layout

• CLAUDE.md this file; README.md for humans.
• docs/ GAME and toolkit knowledge, safe to publish: mechanics.md (verified rules), saturation-design.md (market model), decisions.md (toolkit decisions and guardrails), roadmap.md.
• empire/ (gitignored) OUR game state, nothing here goes public: PROFILE.md, state/company.yaml (synced from FIO), plans/ (own plan specs), docs/ (handoffs, build plans, personal notes).
• puga/ library; tools/ CLIs; plans/examples/ generic plan specs (also test fixtures); state/company.example.yaml example state; tests/; data/ (gitignored fetched data cache); ref/ (gitignored PRUNplanner source).
• Rule: game facts and generic methods go in docs/; anything about the player's own bases, cash, decisions or preferences goes in empire/.

Tools

• tools/state.py sync|show refreshes empire/state/company.yaml from live FIO (cash, permits, buildings, real production efficiency, storage, ships).
• tools/plan_push.py builds/validates PRUNplanner plans from YAML specs (plans/examples/, empire/plans/). Dry run by default; --apply only after the player says yes; only [PuGa]-named plans are created/updated/deleted (delete <uuid>, only when asked); list shows the account's plans.
• tools/simulate.py <spec.yaml | --uuid U> [--off EXT,SME] [--basis real|uni30|vwap30|ask|...] replica of PRUNplanner's simulator (efficiency, workforce, material I/O, profit). Flows and efficiency verified exact vs screenshots; profit within ~2%. The NEW CAPEX line = planned minus already built (from state), the honest payback; ignore the plan-level ROI (PRUNplanner always adds a core module). --uuid reads the SAVED plan from the account (UI edits must be saved first).
• tools/scan.py DEPTH-AWARE recipe scan (use this): buildings the market could absorb, ROI for our own size, patient prices, ask-walked inputs. Fully staffed AND understaffed variants by default (--staffing), freight netted out (--trip-cost, --cargo), HQ/COGC/experts/faction, --planet ID adds that planet's extraction, fertility and COGC (a planet not in state is a new base: no HQ, permits+1), --deprec 60 prices demolish-later. --min-n is ONLY a noise filter on market capacity (use 3, ideally 10); ROI is always for our own size (--own, default 1 building), never at the filtered scale. Below 1 lets sub-building junk in. --json rows.json feeds persistence.py. Library: puga/saturation.py.
• tools/history.py TICKER monthly margin history of the recipe producing TICKER; tools/persistence.py rows.json re-prices scan rows over history (mean ROI 7/14/30/90/180d, payback, net gain over 7 and 14 days, % days profitable). ALWAYS check persistence before recommending: current margins are often a spike.
• tools/chain.py TICKER make-vs-buy cost tree plus sourcing depth of inputs.
• tools/price.py prices across exchanges with VWAP, volume, fill price for a quantity; tools/book.py order-book ladder.
• tools/prun_scan.py, tools/prun_cxarb.py legacy top-of-book scans; overstate thin markets. Baseline only. tools/arb.py replacement is on the roadmap.
• puga/econ.py pure formulas ported from PRUNplanner (efficiency stack, workforce, extraction, production I/O, hab optimizer); tests/test_econ.py holds the reference values.

Model policy

Sonnet builds; spawn a bigger model (Agent model: opus|fable) for the review points in docs/decisions.md. Roadmap: docs/roadmap.md.

Key analytic rule: depth matters

PRUNplanner's ROI Overview ranks recipes as if the market absorbs unlimited output (e.g. 0.25 day ROI on a recipe whose whole market fits in 2 buildings). Every opportunity we report must include saturation (buildings the market can absorb) and, for anything we would act on, persistence (is the margin a spike?). Report ROI at realistic fill prices, not top-of-book.