dodox/PuGa
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Document remote-exchange CX order mechanic

Browse Source 
Confirmed live: placing a BUY order at a remote exchange (tested NC2/Hubur)
works with no local base, storage, or warehouse rental there beforehand -
the default "Storage Location: Warehouse" option is usable without a
prerequisite rental. Storage fee and FX conversion fee size remain unconfirmed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
dodox
2026-10-10 23:06:28 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Sonnet 5
parent 7837ac6631
commit b9b3b9bf4e
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/mechanics.md
+9
View File
@@ -66,6 +66,15 @@ Sources: our own live APEX Ship Flight Control DOM reads (`empire/data/shipping_
- No fuel or time model for GTW duration exists yet in `puga/shipping.py` (fuel-only); this is a documented fact for whoever builds that next, not wired into any tool. - No fuel or time model for GTW duration exists yet in `puga/shipping.py` (fuel-only); this is a documented fact for whoever builds that next, not wired into any tool.
- Per the handbook: LOCK fees have no public formula (gateway-operator-set, displayed in SFC); some gateway links are one-way; each gateway has its own max per-jump cargo volume (m3), separate from ship hold size - none of these are modelled anywhere in this project yet. - Per the handbook: LOCK fees have no public formula (gateway-operator-set, displayed in SFC); some gateway links are one-way; each gateway has its own max per-jump cargo volume (m3), separate from ship hold size - none of these are modelled anywhere in this project yet.
## Placing CX orders at a remote exchange with no base/warehouse there (confirmed 2026-10-10)
Player confirms: placing a BUY order at a remote exchange (tested: NC2, Hubur Station) works with
no local base, storage, or warehouse rental there beforehand - the "Storage Location: Warehouse"
option in the Place Order panel is usable by default, not something you need to build/rent first.
Still UNCONFIRMED: whether holding the resulting inventory there afterward incurs any ongoing
storage fee - this only confirms placing the order doesn't require a prerequisite warehouse, not
that storage itself is free. Also still unconfirmed: FX conversion fee size (a forum thread titled
"remove FX transaction fee entirely" implies one exists, but no amount confirmed).
## HQ in game vs PRUNplanner's "HQ" flag (observed 2026-09-21) ## HQ in game vs PRUNplanner's "HQ" flag (observed 2026-09-21)
- The HQ screen (level 1, base permits 1 / 2) shows "Efficiency gains: Electronics 20.0%", and 23.3% for the next level (permits 1 / 3). That is exactly the faction bonus formula (Antares electronics 5% x 2 x (3 - 2 x used/total)), so the HQ display is the faction bonus. - The HQ screen (level 1, base permits 1 / 2) shows "Efficiency gains: Electronics 20.0%", and 23.3% for the next level (permits 1 / 3). That is exactly the faction bonus formula (Antares electronics 5% x 2 x (3 - 2 x used/total)), so the HQ display is the faction bonus.
- PRUNplanner's plan flag "HQ" (x1.1 on every building) is NOT visible in live efficiencies (smelters 1.3361, HWP 1.0696 both match the model without it). Keep it off. The HQ upgrade adds a base permit and raises the faction bonus. - PRUNplanner's plan flag "HQ" (x1.1 on every building) is NOT visible in live efficiencies (smelters 1.3361, HWP 1.0696 both match the model without it). Keep it off. The HQ upgrade adds a base permit and raises the faction bonus.