docs: fix cost number consistency, drop em-dashes, trim scam section
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b615920843
commit
be54243b54
10
README.md
10
README.md
@ -148,17 +148,17 @@ Simulated on 2020-2025 data, 7d hold, 1d entry delay, 10% of cash per signal:
|
|||||||
| Small ($300M-2B) | 3,871 | ~1.5% | see plot | see plot |
|
| Small ($300M-2B) | 3,871 | ~1.5% | see plot | see plot |
|
||||||
| Micro (<$300M) | 5,048 | ~5% (if listed) | see plot | see plot |
|
| Micro (<$300M) | 5,048 | ~5% (if listed) | see plot | see plot |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Note on micro-cap:** Alpaca does not allow opening new positions in OTC/Pink Sheet stocks (close-only). Most micro-cap signals involve OTC-listed names that are simply not tradeable. For exchange-listed micro-caps, realistic round-trip costs are ~5% or more based on SEC spread data — the simulated alpha disappears entirely at that cost level.
|
**Note on micro-cap:** Alpaca does not allow opening new positions in OTC/Pink Sheet stocks (close-only). Most micro-cap signals involve OTC-listed names that are simply not tradeable. For exchange-listed micro-caps, realistic round-trip costs are ~5% or more based on SEC spread data. The simulated alpha disappears entirely at that cost level.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### About insidercopytrading.com
|
### About insidercopytrading.com
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Their website advertises backtested returns that significantly outperform the market. Those numbers cannot be replicated in practice because the backtesting methodology omits the costs that matter most:
|
Their website advertises backtested returns that significantly outperform the market. Those numbers cannot be replicated in practice because the backtesting methodology omits the costs that matter most:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Same-day entry** at the closing price of the filing date — a price you cannot buy at as a retail trader.
|
- **Same-day entry** at the closing price of the filing date, a price you cannot buy at as a retail trader.
|
||||||
- **No spread or slippage** — SEC data shows small/micro-cap bid-ask spreads of 0.5-2%+ each way.
|
- **No spread or slippage.** SEC data shows small-cap round-trip costs of ~1.5% and micro-cap of ~5%, matching the table above.
|
||||||
- **Survivorship bias** — signals for stocks that later delisted or became untradeable are excluded from their results but would have been part of your portfolio.
|
- **Survivorship bias** -- signals for stocks that later delisted or became untradeable are excluded from their results but would have been part of your portfolio.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Under realistic assumptions, the strategy underperforms SPY across all tested parameters. [insidercopytrading.com](https://insidercopytrading.com) advertises performance numbers that their own subscribers cannot reproduce. Their website is rather pretty though, and their subscription revenue is presumably real.
|
Under realistic assumptions, the strategy underperforms SPY across all tested parameters. [insidercopytrading.com](https://insidercopytrading.com) advertises performance numbers that their own subscribers cannot reproduce. Their website is rather pretty though.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Alpaca integration exists in the codebase (`broker/alpaca_client.py`) but is not fully implemented or tested.
|
Alpaca integration exists in the codebase (`broker/alpaca_client.py`) but is not fully implemented or tested.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user