Files
PuGa/docs/decisions.md
T
dodoxandClaude Sonnet 5 3bbf524ebb Add simulator replica, persistence, planet scan, README; split empire state out of the repo
- tools/simulate.py + puga/simulate.py: replica of PRUNplanner's simulator (flows and
  efficiency verified against screenshots), reports real new capex (planned minus built)
- tools/scan.py: staffing variants, freight, HQ/experts, --planet mode, demolish-later,
  --min-n as a pure market-size filter, --json output
- tools/history.py, tools/persistence.py: margin history and short-horizon payback checks
- tools/plan_push.py: guarded delete; tools/state.py: syncs to empire/
- README with features and setup; CLAUDE.md made generic
- Own-empire material (profile, state, plans, notes) moved to gitignored empire/;
  generic examples in plans/examples and state/company.example.yaml

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-19 00:11:02 +02:00

19 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown

# Decisions log
## 2026-09-18 Project plan and working agreements
- Goal: agent-first toolkit; the player asks, the agent answers by running tools against live data. Not an end-user app.
- PRUNplanner source (`ref/`) is the source of truth for mechanics; conflicts with the old handoff resolved in its favour (`docs/mechanics.md`).
- Scope: whole universe, default region Antares (CX AI1). Python in `.venv`, secrets in `.env`, git branch `master`. No commits unless the player asks.
- Every reported opportunity must include market saturation (buildings the market can absorb, fill-price ROI, absorbable profit/day). Reason: PRUNplanner's ROI Overview ranks recipes with no depth awareness (e.g. 0.25 day ROI on recipes 2 buildings saturate).
- PRUNplanner integration: API key auth (`Authorization: Api-Key <key>`); plans can be created/updated via `/planning/plan/`. Writes only create/update/delete plans prefixed `[PuGa]` (enforced in `tools/plan_push.py`); never touch the player's other plans. Deleting is allowed only on request (or for throwaway test plans the tool itself made). When the player explicitly asks for a plan, creating it directly is fine; show the dry run in the reply.
## Model and review policy
- Default: Sonnet 5 does the building (API plumbing, CLIs, ports, tests).
- Bigger model (Agent tool `model: opus` or `fable`, fresh context, brief with files and question) is allowed and expected at these points:
1. Saturation model design, before building it, and again on real output.
2. Econ formula port (efficiency stack, workforce, hab LP, extraction) checked against PRUNplanner numbers.
3. `plan_push` payload handling and the own-plans-only guard.
4. Big-money recommendations (e.g. BHP go/no-go, roughly 100k AIC): independent second opinion on the numbers.
- If a bigger-model spawn is refused, tell the player and ask them to run the review.
- Routine tool building is not reviewed by a bigger model.